RESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim of this finite element analysis was to evaluate the stress distribution along a premolar's root dentin, its post, and post luting agent when materials with different elastic modulus are used to fabricate one-piece post-and-cores in 2 different design. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two 3D virtual models (for cylindrical and conical post designs) of a mandibular premolar restored with one-piece post-and-core restorations were obtained by using a software. A total of eight post-and-core materials (polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK), polyether-ketone-ketone (PEKK), glass fiber-reinforced polyether-ether-ketone (GFR-PEEK), carbon fiber-reinforced polyether-ether-ketone (CFR-PEEK), gold-palladium alloy (Au-Pd), titanium (Ti), zirconia (Zi) and chromium-nickel (Cr-Ni)) were tested. Maxiumum principals stress (MPS) in the post, post luting agent, and root dentin were determined. A load of 150 N was applied to the buccal cusp in linguo-labial direction at an angle of 45° oblique to the longitudinal axis of the crown. RESULTS: The highest MPS value in post structure was observed with Cr-Ni material for both post designs. Similarly, the highest MPS value in the post luting agent was observed for Cr-Ni, the material with the highest elastic modulus. However, in the root dentin, the highest value was observed in PEEK, the material with the lowest elastic modulus. CONCLUSION: Post material and design influenced the stress concentration in the post, post luting agent, and root dentin. The stress at root dentin was slightly higher for polymeric materials. Cylindrical post design revealed lower stresses than conical post design at root dentin for all post-and-core materials tested.
RESUMO
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The flexural strength of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) and conventional interim resin materials when they are used with a surface sealant is unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the flexural strength of different CAD-CAM polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA)-based polymers and conventional interim resin materials, autopolymerized bisacrylate composite resin and polyethyl methacrylate (PEMA) with and without a surface sealant after thermocycling. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fourteen rectangular-shaped specimens (25×2×2 mm) were fabricated from 5 different interim resin materials, 3 different CAD-CAM PMMA-based polymers: Polident-PMMA, Telio CAD, M-PM-Disc; 2 different conventional interim resin materials, and 1 autopolymerized bisacrylate composite resin: Acyrtemp and 1 PEMA resin: Bosworth Trim according to ISO 10477:2018. Two different types of surface treatments (n=7), conventional polishing and surface sealant application, were applied to 1 surface of the specimens. Ten thousand thermocycles were applied in distilled water for all specimens (5 °C and 55 °C). A 3-point bend test was used to measure the flexural strength of specimens in a universal testing device at a 1 mm/min crosshead speed. The flexural strength data (σ) were calculated in megapascals (MPa) and analyzed by using a 2-way ANOVA. Post hoc pairwise comparisons and independent t test analysis were done (α=.05). RESULTS: According to the 2-way ANOVA, material type (P<.001) significantly affected the flexural strength. Surface treatment type (P=.818) had no significant effect on flexural strength, and no significant interaction was found between material type and surface treatment type (P=.111). CAD-CAM PMMA-based polymers had significantly higher flexural strength than the conventional interim resin materials. However, no significant difference was found within groups of the same type. Also, no significant difference was found in flexural strength values between the conventional polishing and surface sealant groups within each interim resin material (P≥.162). CONCLUSIONS: The flexural strength of CAD-CAM PMMA-based polymers was higher than the flexural strength of conventional bisacrylate composite resin and PEMA interim resin materials after thermocycling. The surface treatment type (conventional polishing and surface sealant application) was not found to affect the flexural strength of CAD-CAM PMMA-based polymers, conventional bisacrylate composite resin, or PEMA interim resin materials.
